meirl
Thursday, 13 Mar 2025
Exclusive insights, data, and analysis for financial market experts.
Search
Have an existing account?
Sign In
Way more than 100 years
yep. “james bond: the time is now” (2007)
it was RIGHT THERE. and they were like 🤷♂️
We didn’t get a 007 movie in 1007 either.
Same reason there are only 12 Friday The 13th movies
Now I’m frustrated.
We did. You just never knew the job was done. 007 operates in silence and obscurity. We only get to see the missions released to the public, after all. You think James Bond takes years off in between assignments?
Thousand years.
I didn’t know this, but as now I know it’s unsettling to me 🥲
Hollywood, explain yourselves!
When the stars align but Hollywood doesn’t: 2007 should’ve been Bond-tastic.
I wonder if James Bond will still be remembered at 3007
because 6 seven 8
shouldve done a double release in 2007
Okay yeah !!! That’s why I felt like something isn’t right 😡😡
2007: The year Bond went undercover as a time traveler to prevent his own existence.
Something I’ve never thought of before but will periodically annoy me for the rest of my life.
Have to do a ‘2007’ Bond movie that’s a flashback. This is the only acceptable payment We, as a public, can accept for the atrocity.
The d. Craig actor person looked like an angry Russian spy, not a great representation
Possibly the biggest fumble in media history.
Future time traveler here. I’m noting this, and will return back in time to fix this obvious oversight.
Bond To The Future (parts 1, 2, & 3) 😂
That’s Tennis!
Some things are better left unsaid