That sounds about right.
Saturday, 29 Mar 2025
Exclusive insights, data, and analysis for financial market experts.
Search
Have an existing account?
Sign In
Four (4)? Who TF is he counting as a 4th!?
Claiming not to know how Thomas and Alito are going to vote is amusing.
When an oath to the Constitution is taken, liberals obey it.
“Supreme Court Justices are allowed to have (rich) friends, Alex”
Justice Robert’s, not verbatim, but that was the gist of it. Fucking hacks…
There are 3 liberals?
How come we can always tell when this moron is lying ? Oh right, his lips or moving. Or when his diaper is full ? Oh right, that’s all the time.
11:00 AM on a Wednesday,
WTF do these two do except tweet?
Why are there one type of tweets from Trump that are written like an adult, like this one, and one where he writes like a moron. Who’s the 2nd tweeter.
For a guy whole stole “Make America Great” from Reagan and desperately wanted to replace Reagan in the Republican zeitgeist, he sure is salty about Reagan.
The real answer is because “the cases coming to the court that Trump pays attention to are so bat shit crazy that it’s only a question of whether the swing votes will do what’s objectively correct or cave to their overlords”.
How can this clown keep getting away with intimidating our judges? Contempt!
What’s a republican judge? Supreme Court justices don’t have a political party
Nailed it!
That Alex Cole person is quickly becoming a personal hero of mine.
One thing Republican taught me is that they can always be bought, sold and bullied into doing things for the rich.
Also why is this news, no shit the judges that aren’t aligned with your party aren’t gonna pass your policies as easy. That’s how this has always worked.
More like why do we have to wait to see if ACB or Robert’s will fire a conscience on a particular issue…
no CAPS?
Riiiiiiiight
Translation: “Why don’t they obey me?”
Trump is so dumb he probably thought the dude who replied misspelled “president.”
Again, another fucking lie. They do not always vote the same. Also love that he’s considering Roberts a liberal simply because he mentioned the constitution to a wannabe king.
Telling that he divides the group by “Republican” and “not-Republican”.
It can be good to be a little unpredictable if the legal issue is complex. It’s awful if it’s simple. For instance, on the issue of whether we should re-start enslaving black people, you can predict that the 4 liberal justices will be firmly against it, but the conservative justices? Who knows.
Full of bullshit. New York judge literally said 2nd amendment didn’t exist in her court room. Sotomayor ruling in favor of the bump stock ban in favor of trump literally changing laws because bump stocks bad. No democrats are activists and don’t follow the constitution.
The irony of democrats complaining about federal officials taking bribes is amazing lol