But the first century was from 0 – 99, what would you call it then?
Rasen1138
24 days ago
Skill issue
kappymeister
24 days ago
Too many people here seem to have this problem, and I think its hilarious
Street-Experience-83
24 days ago
Sounds like an education issue
Leoveer
24 days ago
The people who are confused by this are the same people think “a quarter past 5” means 5:25.
ThePhoenix29167
24 days ago
Skill issue
Master__of_Orion
24 days ago
Seriously?
ScottaHemi
24 days ago
i get why it’s that way but it is indeed weird.
AlphaManInfinate
24 days ago
The first century is year 0-100. You identify it by where it ends, not where it starts.
SharkyWithAsilentaY
24 days ago
its not that confusing, 1st century is the first set of 100 years and so on up to 21st century which is the 21st set of 100 years
clockworkrockwork
24 days ago
So are we calling the first century the zeroth?
wallpope1
24 days ago
So I checked and history from 0 to 99 is not that important now, I agree with you
SqueebopAdiddly
24 days ago
Sounds like a skill issue, but this is the type of stupid shit that barely literate decomposing orange peel of a president would do.
Ribbitmoment
24 days ago
Ah yes, Jesus grew up in the 0th century
Insp3x
24 days ago
Do we make ourselves a year older as well? Because I would not like that.
ConcerenedCanuck
24 days ago
That’s only because there is no century 0. It starts at the first century.
Keldaria
24 days ago
Seriously waiting for an executive order declaring Pluto a planet again
BurntEndMosin
24 days ago
You do realize year 100 to year 199 is 100 years right? Or are you trolling me?
Oohh_Killed_You
24 days ago
Year 0-99 is just referred to as “The Centuryâ„¢”
FrostyKiwi8061
24 days ago
You can skip all the comments . . . it’s the same people making the same arguments we hear every time a year ends in zero.
GimmeMoreSnacks
24 days ago
I don’t get why so many people make fun of this.
When we talk about music from the 90s it’s 1990 to 1999 so what y’all on about skill issue :/
Scootman00
24 days ago
*centuries
shawn_overlord
24 days ago
self report
NarwhalBacon-
24 days ago
I would recommend we just call the First century anything from year 0 to 199. Done.
TjJames72
24 days ago
Scary that this isn’t a far fetched thing to see one day. doubt this administration has an understanding of basic counting principles, and because you can’t understand it let’s change it
BodaciousTacoFarts
24 days ago
New executive order:
Gubernatorial will be changed to Governatorial in the English language.
AutomaticAndThicc
24 days ago
Are you joking or just stupid
Moron_Noxa
24 days ago
That’s stupid. You identify it by where it ends, not where it starts. Gotta learn at school better, than thinking of some stupidly unnecessary changes to a logically sound things.
PhoneImmediate7301
24 days ago
I’d honestly support this. If it’s gonna be stupid at least make it somewhat useful
Maya_On_Fiya
24 days ago
Welcome to the documentary on the year 102 AD. Near the beginning of the zeroth century.
-a very smart person
Admiral_Cranch
24 days ago
In any sain programming language arrays start at zero. So I support this decision.
rik-huijzer
24 days ago
Haha I just got finally used to the idea that 17th century is 16xx, but I would support this order!
IceMustFlow
24 days ago
This is stupid. It just means you don’t understand numbers
But the first century was from 0 – 99, what would you call it then?
Skill issue
Too many people here seem to have this problem, and I think its hilarious
Sounds like an education issue
The people who are confused by this are the same people think “a quarter past 5” means 5:25.
Skill issue
Seriously?
i get why it’s that way but it is indeed weird.
The first century is year 0-100. You identify it by where it ends, not where it starts.
its not that confusing, 1st century is the first set of 100 years and so on up to 21st century which is the 21st set of 100 years
So are we calling the first century the zeroth?
So I checked and history from 0 to 99 is not that important now, I agree with you
Sounds like a skill issue, but this is the type of stupid shit that barely literate decomposing orange peel of a president would do.
Ah yes, Jesus grew up in the 0th century
Do we make ourselves a year older as well? Because I would not like that.
That’s only because there is no century 0. It starts at the first century.
Seriously waiting for an executive order declaring Pluto a planet again
You do realize year 100 to year 199 is 100 years right? Or are you trolling me?
Year 0-99 is just referred to as “The Centuryâ„¢”
You can skip all the comments . . . it’s the same people making the same arguments we hear every time a year ends in zero.
I don’t get why so many people make fun of this.
When we talk about music from the 90s it’s 1990 to 1999 so what y’all on about skill issue :/
*centuries
self report
I would recommend we just call the First century anything from year 0 to 199. Done.
Scary that this isn’t a far fetched thing to see one day. doubt this administration has an understanding of basic counting principles, and because you can’t understand it let’s change it
New executive order:
Gubernatorial will be changed to Governatorial in the English language.
Are you joking or just stupid
That’s stupid. You identify it by where it ends, not where it starts. Gotta learn at school better, than thinking of some stupidly unnecessary changes to a logically sound things.
I’d honestly support this. If it’s gonna be stupid at least make it somewhat useful
Welcome to the documentary on the year 102 AD. Near the beginning of the zeroth century.
-a very smart person
In any sain programming language arrays start at zero. So I support this decision.
Haha I just got finally used to the idea that 17th century is 16xx, but I would support this order!
This is stupid. It just means you don’t understand numbers