I keep breaking Rule 2 accidentally… I guess this sub is not for me
Thursday, 13 Mar 2025
Exclusive insights, data, and analysis for financial market experts.
Search
Have an existing account?
Sign In
Is the thinker thinking or… Just…
I had a friend who got in argument with a person in school about whether or not violence has any relations with justice (he said it does) and later the whole class joined in the argument against him which continued for a whole day. he later came online and talked to me about it, and to his surprise I agreed with him.
his main points were no matter how many laws you create you can’t have it running without people enforcing the law, people don’t just obey laws that are created
and I think if millionaires have the power to bend such enforcements of laws and can make these people turn blind to their crimes they aren’t a “vulnerable group”. this is what happens if the laws can’t be upheld by the people who enforce them
EDIT: also im not justifying the guys actions. im just this is what happens when there is corruption and people not doing their job and that millionaires aren’t a “vulnerable group”
Ah, yes. The age old question of subjective vs. objective morality.
Technically, by some logic, yes, but actually no
I feel like “polarising” can have two criteria.
Some opinion with a 52/49 split does have a majority and minority, but is also more polarizing than 99/1
Secondly i think it’s about how strongly people disagree.
If you voted for instance “you know i don’t think we should kill all cashiers in the country” but then you look over and like 60% of people voted that they do want to kill cashiers you’d be like “WTF?!”
Maybe wasn’t the best example, but something being polarizing means that people either strongly agree or strongly disagree. The choice of president is more polarizing than the choice of ice cream flavor