It is True but it feels like it’s self-congratulatory
Wednesday, 12 Mar 2025
Exclusive insights, data, and analysis for financial market experts.
Search
Have an existing account?
Sign In
“Largest” and “most-read” are things that can easily be measured, so if you have something to prove them wrong, come forward.
PS: It’s really nothing different to a company calling itself the most-bought product of its kind on their own homepage or in other advertising.
Wikipedia
Wikipedia is maintained by the community. If that wasn’t true, it would be edited out eventually, so at this point it can’t even be said that Wikipedia itself wrote that
Sometimes, you gotta give yourself your flowers
āI see no god up hereā¦ except meā
Well it’s true
I mean props to them. Wikipedia is gigachad
Wikipedia feels insecure on account of ChatGPT
Patting its own back, but who else would? Classic.
Most read maybe haha
Wikipedia deserves it’s own metal
I love Wikipedia , one of the better sites out there
It seems that Wikipedia has won the award for the biggest source of procrastination in history
Wikipedia giving itself an award is basically the equivalent of handing a participation trophy to the universe.
Itās like asking the best source for opinion on itselfāwho needs reviews when you can self-congratulate?
Self-love is the best kind of love, right Wikipedia?
Like the video that Snoop dog is thanking himself (I love that video btw)
OP when a site doesnāt denigrate itself šµ
Not true. The Bible is the most read reference work.
In Germany we call that self-incensing
That modifies articles depending on donators agenda šÆ.
Firstly, where did you read that? Did you further their point? Secondly, has any other website made the claim? š³
Well earned.
Wikipedia writes truth. Its a truth.
The “so called” experts at Wikipedia have an [article](https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Wikipedia) about themselves!